> Can it still be called "rock solid" with a data corruption bug in its younger history? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38770168 https://news.ycombinator.

> Can it still be called "rock solid" with a data corruption bug in its younger history? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38770168 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38770168 Ok.It is sand solid. There were a lot of voices on HN trying to downplay the issue, but, a filesystem cannot be named stable, if it corrupts data, in 2020.