2 ms·
> s3 is pretty much a de-facto standard So was XML before, and SGML before it. De-facto changes over time, and backwards compatibility means your decisions are
by Ygg2 2y ago
> s3 is pretty much a de-facto standard
So was XML before, and SGML before it. De-facto changes over time, and backwards compatibility means your decisions are cast in stone.
In 20 years, you could see s3 being abandoned for newer formats, but bun will have to keep those packages.
- 7bit 2y agoSo? I mean, what ist the real downside, beside 5kb additional filesize?
- Ygg2 2y agoAssuming backwards compatibility. Ongoing maintenance burden. Ever increasing API, mistakes set in stone, subpar performance or properties. "Standard library is where libraries go to die." exists as a saying for reason.