I wonder if, in the Pillai paper, I wonder if they tested the SQLite Rollback option with the default synchronous [1] (`NORMAL`, I believe) or with `EXTRA`. I'm

I wonder if, in the Pillai paper, I wonder if they tested the SQLite Rollback option with the default synchronous [1] (`NORMAL`, I believe) or with `EXTRA`. I'm thinking that it was probably the default. I kinda think, and I could be wrong, that SQLite rollback would not have any vulnerabilities with `synchronous=EXTRA` (and `fullfsync=F_FULLFSYNC` on macOS [2]). [1]: https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_synchronous https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_synchronous [2]: https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_fullfsync https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_fullfsync