2 ms·
I agree with this one. But you have to start somewhere. I think in the next several things, websites will be built for agents and not people. So it'll only get
by kilroy123 2y ago
I agree with this one. But you have to start somewhere. I think in the next several things, websites will be built for agents and not people. So it'll only get better and smarter.
- achierius 2y agoWill they? What incentive is there if people haven't started using agents yet? We already have a way to build websites for machines: it's called APIs. And frankly, I think that's a better answer for "hooking LLM into website" -- the things which make APIs hard for humans (discomfort, inconvenience, low discoverability, technical complexity) aren't really problems for LLMs.
- atonse 2y agoAPIs require devs on both sides. This kind of thing could just require the devs on one side to maybe clean up a bit of markup (which I even doubt), and the entire universe of potential consumers on the other side.