3 ms·
America was a much richer market and Apple would never have reached the masses in a poorer place. Spectrums didn't just kickstart programming in the UK but in
by t43562 2y ago
America was a much richer market and Apple would never have reached the masses in a poorer place.
Spectrums didn't just kickstart programming in the UK but in places in Central/Eastern Europe too. I'm from Zimbabwe and they reached us too long before anyone could afford standard American fare.
That cost was absolutely critical. ARM and Raspberry Pi show you how the UK has been incredibly good at bringing computing and computing skills to people.
We programmers from everywhere have patched together Linux from bits and with this cheap commodity hardware, have made a world in which there is no locked door in our own house which we are denied the right to open.
- jajko 2y agoYeah those costs allowed many (not only) kids in poorer countries to actually own a first computer. Apple even at those times would not be reachable. Spectrum clones were extremely popular in central/eastern Europe, for many an introduction to computers.
- Symbiote 2y agoARM does originate from education — the Acorn RISC Machine was created by Acorn following on from the success of the BBC computer, which was developed to improve computing education in schools. It was first used in the Acorn Archimedes computer. Acorn Archimedes which used it was relatively expensive though — £686 (without monitor) in 1990. http://chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/docs/Acorn/Brochures/Acorn_APP87_RetailPriceListApr90.pdf http://chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/docs/Acorn/Brochu...
- wslh 2y ago> ARM does originate from education But all our observations are in hindsight, who could predict that ARM/RISC would be a winner in the XXI century? Apple and mobile devices drove that wave, and Intel failing miserably in the space.
- t43562 2y agoI think the people that created it knew it was important because prioritising performance per watt was a strange strategy and yet it was a killer strategy. ARM was in phones and PDAs long before Apple used one in an iPhone and it got there because of performance/watt. It had already reached 100s of millions of users before the iPhone was released. The PC industry and phone industry were very different and the PC guys were sleeping at the point where ARM showed it was going to change everything. I think the most humorous thing is that the turning point was kicked off by Intel with it's StrongARM which showed everyone that ARM was much more than a microcontroller architecture. Whoever decided to drop that should win a buffoon of the century award. Also ARM's licensing model hasn't made it a megacorp. I suggest (without data so be sceptical) that Qualcomm and Apple and Samsung and so on have all made much more money than ARM did and that's why they tolerated ARM and adopted it. So it was the fact that they weren't making some play for dominance that was absolutely critical - especially as a non-American company.
- jlarcombe 2y agoStrongARM was DEC originally then developed into XScale at Intel when they acquired that division from Digital as part of a lawsuit settlement I believe. The funny thing about the ARM performance/watts thing is that it wasn't originally a design goal except for the need to use a plastic rather than ceramic package to save money. They were aiming for 1 watt but ended up at 0.1 watt!
- t43562 2y agoDead right. Sorry.
- Symbiote 2y agoAnother article on the same site has a good summary of the history of ARM — there was plenty I wasn't aware of: https://www.abortretry.fail/p/mips-for-the-masses https://www.abortretry.fail/p/mips-for-the-masses
- wslh 2y ago
- throw_away_x2 2y agoReminds me of the posters for Linux that I saw at the time "In a world without borders and fences, who needs Windows and Gates"