5 ms·
Indeed I agree with everything you said, although permit me to clarify one thing: "reuse much of their infrastructure" Despite the rosy predictions of the gas
by GlibMonkeyDeath 2y ago
Indeed I agree with everything you said, although permit me to clarify one thing:
"reuse much of their infrastructure"
Despite the rosy predictions of the gas companies, I doubt this is true in practice for most existing natural gas pipelines.
https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/can-we-use-pipelines-and-power-plants-we-have-now-transport-and-burn-hydrogen-or-do-we-need https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/can-we-use-pipelines-and-pow...
I used to do experiments with high-pressure hydrogen. It is a lot harder to get leak-free seals, and hydrogen is so small it can actually penetrate certain metals leading to embrittlement. The nice mercaptan we use so humans can sensitively detect leaks with their noses also won't be as effective any more (it's way too big.) I am not aware of a substitute.
Mass-scale deployment of hydrogen is just not going to happen.
- jfengel 2y agoIsn't mercaptan also much bigger than methane? Do we not have similar issues with natural gas, with gas escaping though holes that mercaptan can't?
- GlibMonkeyDeath 2y agoMethyl mercaptan is slightly larger, but H2 is way smaller than either methane or methanethiol