8 ms·
Yes, this is the principle that violates the WFC algorithm and makes it no longer WFC It is now just a procedural algorithm, which is faster than but loses som
by tbalsam 2y ago
Yes, this is the principle that violates the WFC algorithm and makes it no longer WFC
It is now just a procedural algorithm, which is faster than but loses some of the magic of what makes WFC _so good_.
You can tell by looking at the renders too, the before-and-after of both methods. The difference is incomparable.
That being said, it is cool as a runtime-optimized non-WFC WFC-approximating algorithm.