> You are saying that, any output is possibly infringing, dependandant on the input. What? No. How did you get that from what I wrote? Please engage with the a

> You are saying that, any output is possibly infringing, dependandant on the input. What? No. How did you get that from what I wrote? Please engage with the argument I'm actually making, not some imaginary different argument that you're making up. > No human, in the current epoch of education where copyright has been applicable, has learned, benefited, or exclusively created anything behreft of copyright. What are you even trying to claim here?