5 ms·
I assumed Arxiv was peer-reviewed content only, but it looks like that is not the case. Submission guidelines: https://info.arxiv.org/help/submit/index.html ht
by bradly 2y ago
I assumed Arxiv was peer-reviewed content only, but it looks like that is not the case.
Submission guidelines: https://info.arxiv.org/help/submit/index.html https://info.arxiv.org/help/submit/index.html
Moderation process: https://info.arxiv.org/help/moderation/index.html https://info.arxiv.org/help/moderation/index.html
- williamstein 2y agoAs an academic, I always thought of arxiv as where you put your papers first, before they are peer reviewed. Before that we used our webpages, but they kept breaking.
- _l7dh 2y agoOn the contrary, ArXiv is for pre-prints, i.e. not (yet) peer-reviewed. Off the top of the my head, it was initially used by physicists who often have huge collaborations and long reviewing time. Then the ML community invaded the space later on. This does not mean a peer-reviewed paper cannot go there of course.
- gus_massa 2y agoMost of the times the peer review version has a copiright restriction, so the arxiv version is the finañ draft that may have small differences.
- bigbacaloa 2y ago[dead]