3 ms·
> I don't think it will be a whole bunch longer than that when AI systems are better than humans at almost everything. Better than almost all humans at almost
by rUsHeYaFuBu 2y ago
> I don't think it will be a whole bunch longer than that when AI systems are better than humans at almost everything. Better than almost all humans at almost everything. And then eventually better than all humans at everything, even robotics."
> Amodei also spoke some about the potential implications of highly intelligent AI systems when these AI models can control advanced robotics.
"[If] we make good enough AI systems, they'll enable us to make better robots. And so when that happens, we will need to have a conversation..."
Good luck... I'm sure some altruistic individuals will "hack" things so you don't need to be worried.
- walterbell 2y agoIf the power of _some_ humans depends on robots+AI, and there is a long track record of computers/vehicles being hacked, then there is economic incentive for competing humans to hack robots, including but not limited to competing AI systems. For a fictional treatment of this topic, see Jonathan Nolan's Person of Interest, which begins with one supercomputer, but ends with competing supercomputers and their competing human owners in an endless arms race. The incentives in this scenario are power, not altruism.
- rUsHeYaFuBu 2y ago> economic incentive for competing humans That's assuming there are competing humans left and economic gain to be had.
- walterbell 2y ago> economic gain to be had Humans have one or two incentives beyond economics. > assuming there are competing humans left Indeed, one possible scenario is zero humans left.