3 ms·

This articles seems like it was at least partially written by AI. Lots of fluff and no clear explanation of what PINNs are and how they work (other than the cod

• getnormality 2y ago
  Agreed. Stylistic hints include the heavy use of bulleted lists with bold headings, and the general lack of concern with justifying any vaguely plausible-sounding assertion ("The PINN approach ensures physical consistency, efficient computation, and accurate generalization from limited data.") I think someone who cared about the specific content would at least note that linear PDEs like the heat equation often have closed-form solutions and/or efficient algorithms for solving any particular problem, so aren't likely to be usefully solved with PINNs.