> is typically better in quality of argument as it tends to attract a more intellectual crowd On behalf of the more intellectual crowd, I'm obliged to devastat

> is typically better in quality of argument as it tends to attract a more intellectual crowd On behalf of the more intellectual crowd, I'm obliged to devastatingly elucidate that we're (quite singularly) more intrinsically adept at forcefully projecting ex post facto rationalizations upon our--invariably and universally--emotional decision-making processes whilst obfuscating the same under an avalanche of loquacious hifalutinisms.