I actually think that first chart is the bad one. Inconsistent mixture of US/global, best/average. And inconsistent presentation -- why the single dot on "best

I actually think that first chart is the bad one. Inconsistent mixture of US/global, best/average. And inconsistent presentation -- why the single dot on "best wind farms/global average: 21%"?. The data should be visually grouped by energy type. Range bars are important, for example to show the enormous latitude/climate variation for solar PV (10-25%). You could squeeze far more data into this graphic, and more clearly.