I disagree, as that's silly, and semantically incorrect. Calling the Fay compiler a "transpiler" would imply that it is a source->source compilation, like Coff

I disagree, as that's silly, and semantically incorrect. Calling the Fay compiler a "transpiler" would imply that it is a source->source compilation, like CoffeeScript. From what I can tell, it _actually compiles some of Haskell to JavaScript_, so the term does not really apply. Besides, what's wrong with JS being web assembly? You like JS? Fine, use JS. Nobody is taking that away from you.