It's far enough away in terms of semantics that it's not particularly relavent. I'm haven't written much Haskell, but from what I can tell, Haskell is really al

It's far enough away in terms of semantics that it's not particularly relavent. I'm haven't written much Haskell, but from what I can tell, Haskell is really all about the types. And the laziness. And the purity (which is all about the types). It's missing most of the the things that make Haskell Haskell, and not another functional language. It borrowed some syntax, but from what I can tell, it's much closer semantically to Scheme.