3 ms·
These comparisons are a bit simplistic as it assumes both party's wealth is in cash.
by nsxwolf 2y ago
These comparisons are a bit simplistic as it assumes both party's wealth is in cash.
- grajaganDev 2y agoYour statement is true but misses (deliberately?) the greater point.
- beanjuiceII 2y agowhats the greater point?
- surgical_fire 2y agoThat wealth, even if it's not in hard cash, can distort reality in ways that should simply not be permitted.
- croes 2y agoJust look how Musk could buy Twitter, a billionaire‘s leverage is much higher than normal people’s cash money.