4 ms·

Which OS version is on your iPod Touch? We tested with iOS 5.1 mainly, so I'm not sure how well things work with a 4.x one. We've also done a bit of testing o

Which OS version is on your iPod Touch? We tested with iOS 5.1 mainly, so I'm not sure how well things work with a 4.x one. We've also done a bit of testing on Android versions, and it's quite a headache working around WebKit bugs there.

tfigment 14y ago
iPod Touch was 3.1.2 (about 2 years old) which I will readily admit is rather old but I have reasons for sticking to it on that device. I don't believe 5+ is available for my hardware. Now I don't really expect it to work but it would be one of those nice-to-haves if it did. The Nook I think is up-to-date as of a week or 2 ago. My company does not enforce a standard browser but iPad and Android Tablets would be expected for anything I adopt as well as the standard Windows browsers. I'm not aware of anything that works well everywhere and gives a nice experience which is what this framework tries to do so. Anyway I totally appreciate the work and understand the difficulties involved.
- ryanwatkins 14y ago
  iOS 3 on any device has a tiny marketshare - Instapaper showed it at less than 1.2% of iOS, and that was nearly 9 months ago. (http://www.marco.org/2011/11/30/more-ios-device-and-os-version-stats-from-instapaper http://www.marco.org/2011/11/30/more-ios-device-and-os-versi...) The support matrix for Enyo is here - http://enyojs.com/docs/platforms/ http://enyojs.com/docs/platforms/ Opera Mini and mobile are just not supported. You need to draw the line somewhere. 'Broad' support is good. 'Everything' support is futile, for the feature set desired in a mobile application framework, with the resources the Enyo team has. Enyo is good at creating 'apps' - often things delivered in a PhoneGap-like container or something with defined browser support like Chrome Web Store. Its probably not the general framework for any and all website development needing to support all platforms.

tfigment 14y ago

iPod Touch was 3.1.2 (about 2 years old) which I will readily admit is rather old but I have reasons for sticking to it on that device. I don't believe 5+ is available for my hardware. Now I don't really expect it to work but it would be one of those nice-to-haves if it did. The Nook I think is up-to-date as of a week or 2 ago. My company does not enforce a standard browser but iPad and Android Tablets would be expected for anything I adopt as well as the standard Windows browsers. I'm not aware of anything that works well everywhere and gives a nice experience which is what this framework tries to do so. Anyway I totally appreciate the work and understand the difficulties involved.

ryanwatkins 14y ago
iOS 3 on any device has a tiny marketshare - Instapaper showed it at less than 1.2% of iOS, and that was nearly 9 months ago. (http://www.marco.org/2011/11/30/more-ios-device-and-os-version-stats-from-instapaper http://www.marco.org/2011/11/30/more-ios-device-and-os-versi...) The support matrix for Enyo is here - http://enyojs.com/docs/platforms/ http://enyojs.com/docs/platforms/ Opera Mini and mobile are just not supported. You need to draw the line somewhere. 'Broad' support is good. 'Everything' support is futile, for the feature set desired in a mobile application framework, with the resources the Enyo team has. Enyo is good at creating 'apps' - often things delivered in a PhoneGap-like container or something with defined browser support like Chrome Web Store. Its probably not the general framework for any and all website development needing to support all platforms.