The AI adds no copyright. It either adds no copyright or there is unattributed copyright remaining from whatever training set was used. The rest is under your

The AI adds no copyright. It either adds no copyright or there is unattributed copyright remaining from whatever training set was used. The rest is under your copyright as it is the result of your creative work. 1) Yes, you can release it as open source. 2) These days I release as GPL. My experience releasing MIT/BSD has been joyless. 3) It's a shade unethical. OTOH, given the popularity of these tools, it seems your future won't be negatively affected. 4) Enough to convince a judge. 5) I don't use AI tools. Legally speaking, does the AI-generated code show enough creativity (which is the term for the type of materials which can be under copyright) that it could be traced back to an originator? If not, no worries. If so, how much are you willing to deal with that happening?