3 ms·
Is this really only about keeping secrets for surprise launches? I have a hard time seeing how that alone could justify so extreme an imposition on people. We'
by gruseom 14y ago
Is this really only about keeping secrets for surprise launches? I have a hard time seeing how that alone could justify so extreme an imposition on people.
We're talking about police-state levels of secrecy and compartmentalization. This obviously has a huge cost, so assuming the policy is rational it must have an even huger value. Valuable as surprise launches may be, are they that valuable? Or is there more to this, in which case what is it?
Apple's success is inarguable; I'm not dismissing what they do but taking for granted that I don't understand it. But the author's claim that it is all about occasional theatrical events seems incommensurate with the depth of the phenomenon and how ironclad it is.
- jjacobson 14y agoYeah, but imagine how exciting it would be for your project to be picked as the "one more thing" at a keynote. I can see that as a big incentive for people.
- michaelbuckbee 14y agoI don't think it is the 'occasional theatrical events' so much as what it leads to: millions of dollars of free publicity.
- qntm 14y ago> Valuable as surprise launches may be, are they that valuable? Or is there more to this, in which case what is it? It's about staying so far ahead of the competition that nobody can ever hope to catch up.