4 ms·
> So what you're saying is that a certain group of companies ("third parties") successfully lobbied your government(s) to mandate an artificial monopoly on a pr
by miki123211 2y ago
> So what you're saying is that a certain group of companies ("third parties") successfully lobbied your government(s) to mandate an artificial monopoly on a practical necessity for ostensibly honorable and convenient reasons, and everyone will pay up for this divine virtue.
I'm sure that direct (as in having your own AS number, IP blocks and peering arrangements) access to the internet is even more expensive, not to mention things like your own electricity or your own cellphone network.
Somehow, people aren't complaining that your average bootstrapped SaaS can't become its own ISP.
As long as any reasonably-sized company can become a provider, and as long as the government isn't demanding something outrageous, like the provider having to pay an 'interchange fee' for every invoice send through the network, economies of scale will come in and drive costs down.
- Dalewyn 2y ago>economies of scale will come in and drive costs down. Will it, though? From the sound of it this is a singular system with no competitors and required for any commercial activity, so there's no downward pressure there. As for the intermediaries, there will probably be competition between them but history doesn't bode well (see: Quickbooks, et al.).
- riffraff 2y agoPeppol is a not-for-profit entity, but there are already 400+ authorized server providers. Any provider can be paying 2k per year to operate, but can service millions of invoicing entities so the cost per-invoice can be effectively very low.