4 ms·
In Latvia, there's a requirement to prepare invoices in PEPPOL xml format (B2G from 2025, B2B from 2026), but no requirenent to send them over PEPPOL network.
by cuu508 2y ago
In Latvia, there's a requirement to prepare invoices in PEPPOL xml format (B2G from 2025, B2B from 2026), but no requirenent to send them over PEPPOL network.
- Semaphor 2y agoAnd if I check here [0] > The new required fields were added as part of the harmonisation between Peppol BIS Billing and the XRechnung standard. Peppol BIS Billing is the equivalent of XRechnung for sending e-invoices via Peppol. By harmonising the XRechnung standard and incorporating it into the Peppol “National Ruleset”, the two formats (XRechnung and Peppol BIS Billing) are now almost fully equivalent. It seems that this ends up the same way and compatible with the solution in Germany and France, and doesn’t have any of the issues OP describes. [0]: https://en.e-rechnung-bund.de/new-version-xrechnung-standard-3-0-1-available/ https://en.e-rechnung-bund.de/new-version-xrechnung-standard...