> In the process of a wider societal dialogue, we can exchange these points of view and eventually come to a rough approximation of the objective state of thing

> In the process of a wider societal dialogue, we can exchange these points of view and eventually come to a rough approximation of the objective state of things. By and large discussion about politics in civil society seems to me riddled with factional language and lenses, with lies and hostile, bad-faith accusations, rather than resemble some Rawlsian disinterested dialogue.