3 ms·

I hate how paper titles are worded like seo techniques.

• spiritplumber 2y ago
  Turn something into a metric and it will be misused. Ever always was
  • jampekka 2y ago
    Attention is all you need!
    • llm_trw 2y ago
      The attention economy and its consequences.
      • littlestymaar 2y ago
        Unexpected Kaczynski.
    • visarga 2y ago
      138,000 papers are "X is all you need", now 138,001 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ro&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22is+all+you+need%22&btnG= https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ro&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22i...
      • hatthew 2y ago
        640 if you use intitle, exclude citations, and filter to 2017 onwards
  • TeMPOraL 2y ago
    > Ever always was Always has been. silent gunshot
• verdverm 2y ago
  This is a riff on the original "attention is all you need" paper, there has been a few of these lately
  • Matthyze 2y ago
    A few? A multitude.
    • verdverm 2y ago
      This one might be right if they have in fact unified multiple attention approaches into a single framework see Section 3.4
• Upvoter33 2y ago
  On the one hand, sure, it's dumb. But, on the other hand, it's hard to get researchers to read your paper, esp. in fast-moving areas. Every little thing might be the difference between reading the abstract or not. Reading the abstract might lead to reading the intro. And so on. So, for better or worse, the competition for human eyeballs is real. Ironically, in this case, "attention" is all that the authors want.
• LPisGood 2y ago
  Having a catchy title is great for short hand. If it didn’t have such a catchy name I probably wouldn’t remember Flush+Reload, Spectre, or even Attention is All You Need