3 ms·
>case where those murders were part of the case, is just message board jazz hands. you're trying to look like you don't understand or aren't aware that jury d
by trhway 2y ago
>case where those murders were part of the case, is just message board jazz hands.
you're trying to look like you don't understand or aren't aware that jury didn't convict him of murder-for-hire.
He chose a trial by jury, not by a judge. Nevertheless the judge herself decided that he is guilty of the murder-for-hire, and additionally the judge used significantly lower standard than required for conviction.
- tptacek 2y agoThat's not what happened at all. You can just read the filings on PACER; I'm sure they're all free on Courtlistener by now.
- trhway 2y ago[flagged]
- tptacek 2y agoFeel free to use the search bar to see what's been written (including by me) in the zillion discussions we've had on this case in the past. Again: primary source documentation of what happened in that trial is right there for you to read; you're just a Google search away from it.