3 ms·
To be fair - he was not pardoned for that, he could still be charged for it. He was only pardoned for crimes related to drugs.
by DannyBee 2y ago
To be fair - he was not pardoned for that, he could still be charged for it.
He was only pardoned for crimes related to drugs.
- johnneville 2y agodo you know that is actually the case ? i've been trying to find the text of the pardon and haven't been able to yet. can only find Trump's description of it as "full and unconditional" edit: i see your other comment with the context
- DannyBee 2y agoThey unfortunately have not released the text yet. It should eventually pop up here: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/clemency-recipients https://www.justice.gov/pardon/clemency-recipients (among other places)
- DannyBee 2y agoIt is now there, see - https://www.justice.gov/pardon/media/1386096/dl https://www.justice.gov/pardon/media/1386096/dl He was not pardoned for any crimes not charged, and therefore could still be charged.
- tptacek 2y agoDoes this mean California could go after Ulbricht for solicitation on the murder scheme, like, tomorrow?