3 ms·
A judge and system who would give him 2 life sentences for this should not be trusted when he also factored in things which he wasn't charged and convicted of.
by busymom0 2y ago
A judge and system who would give him 2 life sentences for this should not be trusted when he also factored in things which he wasn't charged and convicted of.
- bb88 2y agoThere are only mandatory minimums -- not mandatory maximums in sentencing. I feel like me might disagree on Ulbricht, but overall mandatory maximums make a lot of sense.
- FireBeyond 2y agoIt is common that several outcomes are subject - with the defendants specific agreement - to be evaluated by a court on preponderance, not a jury. This was not judicial malpractice.
- busymom0 2y agoI am sorry but there's no way giving him more than 2 life sentences has any justification whatsoever. Even the people who actually sold drugs on his site got out in 2 years. And the person who hired someone for hitman also only got 6 years. This is exactly the type of case where pardon makes 100% sense. Ps. El Chapo got shorter sentence than Ross.
- ac29 2y ago> Ps. El Chapo got shorter sentence than Ross. They both had greater-than-life sentences, which in practice is the same thing.
- FireBeyond 2y ago> Even the people who actually sold drugs on his site got out in 2 years. And Ross made millions from those people selling drugs on his site. Quite possibly more than any person selling drugs on his site. And attempted to hire hitmen to prevent anyone stopping it. Not even as a potential "crime of passion", but solely to protect his money train. And there's this whole false narrative of "youthful indiscretions". He didn't start building the site til he was 28 and was mostly running it in his early 30s.