4 ms·
You don't use 5.56mm nato for deer either. The point was suitability (for hunting) and relative "power" or "lethality" (as much as I hate those terms because t
by harshreality 14y ago
You don't use 5.56mm nato for deer either.
The point was suitability (for hunting) and relative "power" or "lethality" (as much as I hate those terms because they incite caliber wars) of the rifle Holmes used compared to what is typically used for hunting. Typical hunting calibers for medium and large game (regardless of whether the hunt is in the U.S. or Africa) are .308 or .30-06 on up. Some specialized .2xx calibers might work, but run higher risk of causing more cruelty to the animal (by not being sufficiently lethal). That's why hunting laws tend to dictate calibers, not because banned calibers are too lethal but because they're not lethal enough. Even .308 (7.62mm nato) is commonly eschewed for large game.
Anyone talking about a .223 rifle as high-powered or particularly dangerous relative to common hunting rifle calibers really has no idea what they are talking about.
- lancefisher 14y agoI used a .270 for years hunting deer and elk. I can assure you they are effective for distances up to 400 yards. Also, read about Jack O'Conner who was a proponent of the .270 for hunting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_OConnor_(American_writer) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_OConnor_(American_writer)
- grecy 14y agoI don't doubt the .270 is very capable. Here in the Yukon, it illegal to use anything less than 300 caliber for Bison.