That's quite a headline. But the article is mostly about delegations of authority (and that not in any real detail), a story of US contractors conducting assas

That's quite a headline. But the article is mostly about delegations of authority (and that not in any real detail), a story of US contractors conducting assassinations, and one (1) corroborating opinion -- that corroboration in no detail, and almost certainly second-hand. There's a paragraph about the "terrifying background", in absolutely no detail whatsoever. This sort of thing has become a subgenre of its own, one where the documentation almost always falls well short of the promise. People should think about what the cries of "Wolf!" are doing to our ability to spot truly documented and disturbing problems.