4 ms·
> You don't have to use their platforms. Yes, but you can reach far fewer people if you do not. This is well on the way to arguing that you are free to say wh
by graemep 2y ago
> You don't have to use their platforms.
Yes, but you can reach far fewer people if you do not.
This is well on the way to arguing that you are free to say what you want in a sealed room.
- Hasu 2y agoYou don't have the right for anyone to care about what you say, and never have. Your argument seems to be that the New York Times has no choice but to publish my op-ed, because otherwise how will anyone find it?
- graemep 2y agoNo, its more like arguing that telecoms companies (especially ones with monopolies) should not be able to refuse service on grounds that they do not like views people express in their phone calls. The NYT is a publication, social media are platforms.
- scarface_74 2y agoAnd? If you are on a platform and depending on random people finding your message, how are you going to get above the noise? You have to put in the work. Major changes happen by people getting thier voice out before social media
- graemep 2y ago> Major changes happen by people getting thier voice out before social media But they did not have to compete with social media. There are more third spaces (as is often discussed on HN) and local ways to get started.