3 ms·
Information technology has grown exponentially since the first life form created a self-sustaining, growing loop. You can see evolution speeding up rapidly, th
by Nevermark 2y ago
Information technology has grown exponentially since the first life form created a self-sustaining, growing loop.
You can see evolution speeding up rapidly, the jumbled information inherent in chemical metabolisms evolved to centralize their information in DNA, and then as DNA evolved to componentize body plans.
RATE: over billions of years.
Nerves, nervous systems, brains, all exponentially drove individual information capabilities forward.
RATE: over hundreds of millions, tens of millions, millions, 100s of thousands.
Then the human brains enabled information to be externalized. Language allowed whole cultures to "think", and writing allowed cultures ability to share, and its ability to remember to explode.
RATE: over tens of thousands, thousands.
Then we developed writing. A massive improvement in recording and sharing of information. Progress sped up again.
RATE: over hundreds of years.
We learned to understand information itself, as math. We learned to print. We learned how to understand and use nature so much more effectively to progress, i.e. science, and science informed engineering.
RATE: over decades
Then the processing of information got externalized, in transistors, computers, the Internet, the web.
RATE: every few years
At every point, useful information accumulated and spread faster. And enabled both general technology and information technology to progress faster.
Now we have primitive AI.
We are in the process of finally externalizing the processing of all information. Getting to this point was easier than expected, even for people who were very knowledgable and positive about the field.
RATE: every year, every few months
We are rapidly approaching complete externalization of information processing. Into machines that can understand the purpose of their every line of code, every transistor, and the manufacturing and resource extraction processes supporting all that.
And can redesign themselves, across all those levels.
RATE: It will take logistical time for machine centric design to takeover from humans. For the economy to adapt. For the need for humans as intermediaries and cheap physical labor to fade. But progress will accelerate many more times this century. From years, to time scales much smaller.
Because today we are seeing the first sparks of a Cambrian explosion of self-designed self-scalable intelligence.
Will it eventually hit the top of an "S" curve? Will machines get so smart that getting smarter no longer helps them survive better, use our solar systems or the stars resources, create new materials, or advance and leverage science any further?
Maybe? But if so, that would be an unprecedented end to life's run. To the acceleration of the information loop, from some self-reinforcing chemical metabolism, to the compounding progress of completely self-designed life, far smarter than us.
But back to today's forecast: no, no the current advances in AI we are seeing are not going to slow down, they are going to speed up, and continue accelerating in timescales we can watch.
First because humans have insatiable needs and desires, and every advance will raise the bar of our needs, and provide more money for more advancement. Then second, because their general capability advances will also accelerate their own advances. Just like every other information breakthrough that has happened before.
Useful information is ultimately the currency of life. Selfish genes were just one embodiment of that. Their ability to contribute new innovations, on time scales that matter, has already been rendered obsolete.
- Retric 2y ago> Grown exponentially since the first life form Not really. The total computing power available to humanity per person has likely gone down as we replaced “self driving” horses with cars. People created those curve by fitting definitions to the curve rather than data.
- Nevermark 2y agoYou can't disprove global warming by pointing out an extra cool evening. But I don't understand your point even as stated. Cars took over from horses as technology provided transport with greater efficiencies and higher capabilities than "horse technology". Subsequently transport technology continued improving. And continues, into new forms and scales. How do you see the alternative, where somehow horses were ... bred? ... to keep up?
- reaperman 2y agoCars do not strictly have higher capabilities than horses. GP was pointing out that horses can think. On a particularly well-trained horse, you could fall asleep on it and wake up back at your house. You can find viral videos of Amish people still doing this today.
- Nevermark 2y agoAh, good point. Then the global warming point applies, but in a much less trivial way. There is turbulence in any big directed change. Better overall new tech often creates inconveniences, performs less well, than some of the tech it replaces. Sometimes only initially, but sometimes for longer periods of time. A net gain, but we all remember simpler things whose reliability and convenience we miss. And some old tech retains lasting benefits in niche areas. Old school, inefficient and cheap light bulbs are ironically, not so inefficient when used where their heat is useful. And horses fit that pattern. They are still not obsolete in many ways, tied to their intelligence. As companions. As still working and inspiring creatures. -- I suspect the history of evolution is filled with creatures getting that got wiped out by new waves, that were more generally advanced, but less advanced in a few ways. And we have a small percentage of remarkable ancient creatures still living today, seemingly little changed.