3 ms·
I didn't know anything about this and found the article hard to understand at first, but thankfully the Wikipedia articles on the subject are pretty okay: https
by senkora 2y ago
I didn't know anything about this and found the article hard to understand at first, but thankfully the Wikipedia articles on the subject are pretty okay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonnenschein%E2%80%93Mantel%E2%80%93Debreu_theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonnenschein%E2%80%93Mantel%E2...
The very abbreviated TL;DR of this post is:
1. We are taught that markets look like this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Supply-demand-equilibrium.svg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Supply-d...
2. By applying rigorous math ("general equilibrium theory"), it turns out that there is no reason that markets can't look like this instead: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/SMD_Demand_Curve.svg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/SMD_Dema...
3. OP's article summarizes how economists have reacted to this problem.
- hackeraccount 2y agoFor other reasons I'm reading Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations and this seems like nothing that Smith would object to. He'd say there's a natural price that that the market price gravitates around - very much like that second graphic.
- bckr 2y agoThe point is there are multiple "natural prices" that the market price may gravitate around. If Adam Smith thinks there's only one "natural price", then he's wrong, and you probably want to read with that idea in mind.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]