4 ms·
> Or Lithuania, arguably[0] the most anti-China Also one one of the biggest resellers of various products to Russia and other economically affiliated countries
by qwytw 2y ago
> Or Lithuania, arguably[0] the most anti-China
Also one one of the biggest resellers of various products to Russia and other economically affiliated countries they don't even produce locally.
e.g. https://www.tridge.com/news/strange-news-of-the-day-lithuania-is-the-leader-in https://www.tridge.com/news/strange-news-of-the-day-lithuani...
Also countries like Lithuania are not blacklisted. They are still allowed to buy GPUs/etc. below a certain cap. Realistically their domestic demand is nowhere near the cap. So what's' the problem exactly? (unless they want to resell those chips to third parties)
- xdennis 2y agoThe problem is putting US allies like Lithuania and Poland in the same tier as communist countries like Laos or Vietnam. I'd put it another way, if demand is below the cap, then why have the cap? Why destroy relations for free? It's not like you can't do something if they are found to sell chips to China.
- qwytw 2y agoSo that companies in less reliable countries like Lithuania couldn't purchase high numbers of GPU and resell them to Russia/China/etc. through countries like Kazakhstan etc. (like they do now with other products). > if demand is below the cap, then why have the cap? It might be for Lithuania. But the same 50,000 cap applies to Poland. Anyway: > Individual companies headquartered in tier two countries—for [...] can access significantly higher limits if they apply for their own national validated end user status. That process involves making verifiable security commitments, [...]. If a company obtains this status, its chip imports won’t count toward the country’s overall maximum cap So this isn't an export ban as such.