4 ms·
> Sure, if we all get a stake of ownership in it. But we do, in the sense that benefits flow to the prompter, not the AI developers. The person comes with a pr
by visarga 2y ago
> Sure, if we all get a stake of ownership in it.
But we do, in the sense that benefits flow to the prompter, not the AI developers. The person comes with a problem, AI generates responses, they stand to benefit because it was their problem, the AI provider makes cents per million tokens.
AI benefits follow the owners of problems. That person might have started a projct or taken a turn in their life as a result, the benefit is unquantifiable.
LLMs are like Linux, they empower everyone, and benefits are tied to usage not development.
- vkou 2y agoWe've seen this kind of system before. It was called sharecropping, and it was terrible. The price will be ratcheted up, such that the majority of the economic surplus will go to the owner of AGI - with pricing tiered to the query you're asking it. The more economic utility the user will derive from making the query, the more the AGI's owner will charge them.
- ConspiracyFact 2y agoAs Are you claiming that the right to use a product or service implies a sort of ownership of it? If it’s free to use, I suppose that makes some sense. If you’re saying that the right to purchase use of it implies a level of ownership, that’s just prima facie absurd.