4 ms·
"I've decided I don't like the law, so AI companies shouldn't have to follow it. And besides, everybody does it." That's the gist of your argument. Take a mome
by fugalfervor 2y ago
"I've decided I don't like the law, so AI companies shouldn't have to follow it. And besides, everybody does it."
That's the gist of your argument. Take a moment to consider what can be justified by that same reasoning. Just about anything.
People work hard on what they write. Many writers struggle to generate a reliable income. Yet to you, it's okay for a competitor to take that work without compensating the author, then use it in a product they will sell. Because "information wants to be free".
It breaks my fucking heart how little our society cares about the compensation of artists, authors, and creative people generally; all while gobbling it up and expecting it for free.
- verdverm 2y agoWhen you hear musicians and artists talk about their career, they will talk about their inspirations. They create original works, in part based on their influences, and we do not expect them to pay out to every artist they have encountered. Why is software different? Where should we draw the line between fair use and copyright violation when it comes to AI?