3 ms·
That's actually pretty well defined. Public incitement to: Violence against groups/individuals, Hatred based on protected characteristics, Discrimination Prot
by mog_dev 2y ago
That's actually pretty well defined.
Public incitement to: Violence against groups/individuals, Hatred based on protected characteristics, Discrimination
Protected characteristics include: Race, Color, Religion, Descent, National/ethnic origin, Sexual orientation, Gender identity, Disability
Specific prohibited conduct: Publicly condoning/denying genocide, Publicly condoning/denying crimes against humanity
, Public distribution of materials promoting hate, Using hate speech online/digital platforms
Can you please detail here why EU should be more lax on the points stated above?
- lionkor 2y agobecause I've ran a team overseeing the moderation for 200k players in an online game, and the real issue is the application, not the word, of the law/rules. You can copy, paste, write and say any number of smart words, but the real world is very messy. You quickly get something that is on the line, or that you misjudge because of your own biases.
- jhanschoo 2y agoI think that a minimal pair would be of interest > Publicly condoning/denying genocide Saying "X genocide did not happen" clearly falls under the rule. But I wonder if saying "I think that X genocide did not happen", which is statement of opinion, would be considered by censors/moderators to be hate speech.