3 ms·

A good point. I should make sure I don't misuse a term of art. Thank you for the clarification/correction! "Protected into the future" ?

• tptacek 2y ago
  "Harvest now, decrypt later" is how I've heard the attack described; there isn't really an engineering feature of protocols or ciphers that (a) has a name and (b) directly addresses this problem. But you're roughly right that the interactive nature of how DNSSEC (and signatures more generally) are used makes them of secondary importance in PQ upgrades.