>>But I do not think it's very useful to say that Erlang is object oriented, since it will confuse a lot of people I find it useful to instill this kind of con

>>But I do not think it's very useful to say that Erlang is object oriented, since it will confuse a lot of people I find it useful to instill this kind of confusion in people around me. "You talk about encapsulation? Look at erlang" "Polymorphism? Haskel" "OOP? Javascript, CLOS" "Static/dynamic typing? Look here - your java code is in fact dynamic, if you're really want to taste real static - look at ML-family or something near"