>It has also been pointed out that Dorsey does not bear sole responsibility for Twitter’s sale. However, he is complicit and he profited handsomely from the sal

>It has also been pointed out that Dorsey does not bear sole responsibility for Twitter’s sale. However, he is complicit and he profited handsomely from the sale and all of its harmful consequences. It's funny how "harmful" rarely requires the nature of that harm, and the victims of that harm, to be specified. >The open source community and FOSDEM itself would not exist without collective action. Our protest to defend its principles is in that spirit. Together we can, and will, de-platform Jack Dorsey. I'm going to try and say this as politely as I can. Open source has always, always been about people showing up and doing the work, often unasked and unrewarded. Those individuals deserve thanks and respect. What they don't deserve is having their work be rolled into an amorphous borg blob that any hack activist with a chip on their shoulder can wear as a skin suit to justify their latest political tantrum. I half suspect this is just people acting out because they hate Musk, but can't touch him, so they go after the next best available Elon substitute.