4 ms·
The application itself is content from the POV of the Constitution. Universal City Studios v Corley
by llamaimperative 2y ago
The application itself is content from the POV of the Constitution.
Universal City Studios v Corley
- absolutelastone 2y ago"Content" is narrower than "speech". In that case the restriction was described as "content-neutral". Hence it didn't require strict scrutiny, only intermediate scrutiny. Which seems like the blueprint for how they wrote the TikTok law.