4 ms·
Ok, but wouldn't that be also true if you substitute every "bunker" and "defence" word with "tank" and "attack"? I don't see a goal of your comment.
by szszrk 2y ago
Ok, but wouldn't that be also true if you substitute every "bunker" and "defence" word with "tank" and "attack"?
I don't see a goal of your comment.
- duskwuff 2y agoTanks, unlike bunkers, can move. Fairly quickly, in fact.
- bruce511 2y agoThey can move. They can be repositioned. They can congregate to provide mutual support. More significantly they can be used in attack as well as defense.
- szszrk 2y agoSure, but my point stands. It still has to be occupied by trained troops to make sense, just like those bunkers. Both had to be used smart, both can be misused. That doesn't make them pointless, it makes their use cases narrow. Hence a coffee shop in one of them.
- InitialLastName 2y agoRight, "able to operate in territory you didn't control yesterday" is a pretty big offensive bonus for tanks relative to bunkers.