3 ms·
Even without following the letter of the law it's entirely rational behaviour for a popular market leader to foment outrage by fully blacking out services. 150
by dmix 2y ago
Even without following the letter of the law it's entirely rational behaviour for a popular market leader to foment outrage by fully blacking out services. 150 million users (in the US alone) is a very powerful political influence. Politicians frequently fold for a few thousand vocal people complaining on the internet.
It was a gambit used for net neutrality in 2014 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Slowdown_Day https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Slowdown_Day
- nightpool 2y agoOf course it's rational behavior. Nico was the one claiming that they were just "following the law", that's what this subthread was about. If you agree that TikTok was making a political point by shutting down, then you agree with the person you're replying to.
- dmix 2y agoNot everything on the internet has to be a binary argument.
- paulddraper 2y agoSure that may be smart to forward interest. Nico argued TikTok made the minimum change required by law.
- nthingtohide 2y agoSuch compromises happen between companies as well when a particular app is popular. Facebook and Uber accessing private java apis which meant Google couldn't change the internals as these apps are popular.