3 ms·

But it's not insider trading at this level, that's the whole point. This is a freakishly small amount of stock. At these levels he would own a lot more META if

But it's not insider trading at this level, that's the whole point. This is a freakishly small amount of stock. At these levels he would own a lot more META if he just bought QQQ (META is 3.3% of composition) with a fraction of his net worth

timewizard 2y ago
> not insider trading at this level The definition of insider trading does not take into consideration "levels." > This is a freakishly small amount of stock. That he personally purchased. I don't know what private and public entities he may have shared the information with or what other purchases traded on his information. > At these levels he would own a lot more META if he just bought QQQ (META is 3.3% of composition) with a fraction of his net worth At the level of an individual game a card counter is mathematically not a huge problem. They're just shifting the odds by 1 or 2% in their favor. I wonder why casinos bother to kick them out? They'd stand to win a lot more if they just flopped everything on roulette anyways. I think you're letting the imputed scope interfere with your evaluation and mistaking net worth for liquid assets.