2 ms·
yes, the Trump faction also flirted with anti-tech politics in the 2016-2020 cycle - but there have been shifts since then. i don't disagree with you that a sig
by whimsicalism 2y ago
yes, the Trump faction also flirted with anti-tech politics in the 2016-2020 cycle - but there have been shifts since then. i don't disagree with you that a significant part of this alignment is due to strategic reasons - but it doesn't fully explain outsized donations to Trump prior to his election and shifts in donation patterns by regular tech workers. I do think that there has been a real political shift rightwards in SF/SV, especially among the tech elites but percolating downwards.
- creato 2y ago[flagged]
- matthewdgreen 2y agoThere has definitely been a rightward shift in SV management and ownership. Maybe a lesser shift in individual workers, but it's really hard to tell. And frankly, that hardly merits a footnote when compared to the sums that the wealthiest can spend on elections now.
- spacechild1 2y agoThey don't want those pesky regulations. Marc Andreessen says it openly: https://a16z.com/politics-and-the-future/ https://a16z.com/politics-and-the-future/ This line in particular sums up the cynical stance of these billionaires: > We are non-partisan, one issue voters: If a candidate supports an optimistic technology-enabled future, we are for them. If they want to choke off important technologies, we are against them. They simply don't care about society as a whole, they want their businesses to thrive, no matter what.