3 ms·
You're analogizing the freedom to access the internet to driving on the wrong side of the road?
by perihelions 2y ago
You're analogizing the freedom to access the internet to driving on the wrong side of the road?
- School-Cotton 2y agoThe point of the analogy wasn't to say those two things are the same. It was reductio ad absurdum, a totally valid proof technique in math and logic. If person A says "X implies Y", then person B points out that X would also imply obvious nonsense Z, it doesn't mean that B is saying Y and Z are the same, or even that Y isn't true. They're just pointing out that X is too general to possibly be true.