4 ms·
There is, it's a few days old, and it's a non-enforcement from the Biden administration, according to the man himself and his staffers, he intends to let it be
by kj4ips 2y ago
There is, it's a few days old, and it's a non-enforcement from the Biden administration, according to the man himself and his staffers, he intends to let it be the next administration's problem.
Whatever the next administration does when it takes power is yet to be seen.
The restrict act was written really strangely, and I assume Oracle required some assurance from someone to not just delete Bytedance's accounts and resources.
- qingcharles 2y agoThat wasn't an executive order, as far as I'm aware it was just a statement. It had no legal value, which was why TikTok asked for more assurance. The fine to each company (Apple, Google, Oracle, TikTok) was in the order of around $5bn each if they kept the lights on, so I would be hesitant to keep it running too without something in writing.
- grajaganDev 2y agoRight. The Legal teams at Apple and Google will follow the existing law as written. No EO from Trump will change that.
- wumeow 2y agoIf TikTok was concerned that Biden’s statement wouldn’t be honored, they wouldn’t have turned service back on today while Biden is still president. They’ve had months to work out some sort of deal with Trump, this whole show they’ve put on the past couple days is propaganda.
- qingcharles 2y agoI have to agree with this. If they'd waited until Monday it would have been different, but legally nothing changed overnight except more puffery.
- ipsum2 2y agoThe title was changed, it used to be "Trump's executive order..." something.