3 ms·
> And the third one is it takes them forever to ship updates. Bluesky is so much faster moving when it comes to implementing new features, but Mastodon ships ev
by shafyy 2y ago
> And the third one is it takes them forever to ship updates. Bluesky is so much faster moving when it comes to implementing new features, but Mastodon ships even slower than Twitter which is an "achievement" in itself.
Mastodon is a non-profit with a handfull of engineers. How can you compare their resources to something like Bluesky or even Twitter, that has thousands of engineers, is beyond me.
- acjohnson55 2y agoBluesky also has but a handful of engineers
- zimpenfish 2y agoBut was initially started internally by Twitter with millions of dollars of funding and since being split out has taken several million dollars in outside funding from VCs. Which does help grease the wheels somewhat, no?
- acjohnson55 2y agoYeah, probably.
- shafyy 2y agoI don't know how many engineers work at Bluesky, but my guess is that their yearly budget is at least 10 times of Mastodon.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> Mastodon is a non-profit with a handfull of engineers. How can you compare their resources to something like Bluesky or even Twitter, that has thousands of engineers, is beyond me Put another way, they were structured in a way that doesn't allow them to compete.