I don't get it. If you explicitly acknowledge that"free software" is ambiguous, how does clarifying it by adding (free as in beer/speech) make things more confu

I don't get it. If you explicitly acknowledge that"free software" is ambiguous, how does clarifying it by adding (free as in beer/speech) make things more confusing, instead of less? The whole point is that the phrase "free software" has nothing to do with money. It almost seems like you want to make things simpler by just merging the two concepts. But that's fundamentally not what the movement is about.