2 ms·
Hey, if one is only using apache and serving static files, is there any security issue one needs to be in the lookout? I was surprised fail2ban was the only thi
by a1o 2y ago
Hey, if one is only using apache and serving static files, is there any security issue one needs to be in the lookout? I was surprised fail2ban was the only thing installed there and it seems reliably working.
- Izmaki 2y agoIf you keep Apache itself up-to-date then typically speaking no. There is always a reason to be on the lookout and <insert generic speech about security concerns here>, but static files are - well - static. Not much to mess with there. If you choose to do smart things like caching and such, that opens a whole new can of worms, but basic "this is my HTML page" stuff is typically "not-unsafe" (as opposed to "safe").