3 ms·
The opinions were expressed, just with an actor's voice.
by Ylpertnodi 2y ago
The opinions were expressed, just with an actor's voice.
- swores 2y agoThe person you replied to was themselves replying to someone talking about a theoretical future ban, not the past ban, and since that first person was talking about a positive of no longer hearing from unspecified famous people they clearly weren't talking about a law that would once again make it easy for impersonators to make it so that people still hear the same views in the same voices just technically spoken by actors.