4 ms·
> made them vote together across party lines Ha, is that uniparty vote supposed to be something meaningful? If the government had true concerns, they could 1)
by extheat 2y ago
> made them vote together across party lines
Ha, is that uniparty vote supposed to be something meaningful? If the government had true concerns, they could 1) be aired to the public and 2) other senators like Thomas Massie and Rand Paul would not be speaking against the ban.
People can change their views and minds. It's only a problem when you lie and pretend you didn't. Pres Biden signed the law and could suspend it now if he wanted, but he chose not to do it as it'd be contradictory to his own signing. And of course soon-to-be President Trump will get the credit for reverting it. Nobody cares about the details beyond those invested into politik.
- daemoens 2y agoIt's meaningful because it's one of the few things congress could actually pass. You can count on one hand the number of bills that passed this year with that kind of support that wasn't something like a budget bill.
- kgen 2y agoOr maybe occam's razor suggests that there's indeed something more concerning about usage of the app that we aren't privy to?
- bendbro 2y agoYes, occam's razor would suggest the government randomly decided exactly now was the time to start working in our best interests, and also those interests are super secret and have absolutely nothing to do with recent geopolitical happenings nor anything to do with the stated beliefs of the politicians driving the government.
- kgen 2y agoI don't know why you think it's randomly (or recently) decided -- it started in 2020 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictions_on_TikTok_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictions_on_TikTok_in_the_...), culminating in this act (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecting_Americans_from_Foreign_Adversary_Controlled_Applications_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecting_Americans_from_Fore...) banning the app, which passed 360-58. Have you ever gotten 36 people to agree to something, let alone 360? There's obviously more to this that we aren't aware of.
- westmeal 2y agoSure, they don't like the idea of china influencing the youth but more importantly it's making Israel look bad.
- beepbopboopp 2y agoThis is take is so naive. Tiktok is the equivalent of CBS, NBC, FOX and ABC all being owned by the US's largest threat/enemy's government. Chinese nationals are banned from even accessing TikTok within China in addition to the Chinese government not allowing America media apps to compete their market. There isnt an argument in the world that this app isnt bad for US interests and the only reason this is emotional at all for people is that it took too long for the government to act.
- westmeal 2y agoSo are we at war with china now or what?
- amanaplanacanal 2y agoCold-ish war.